Considerations in Athletic Performance Enhancement Training: Overhead Weight Room Exercises

Today’s article is a guest blog by Rob Panariello. HERE is an interview with Rob from 3 years ago in case you’d like to learn more about his background.
Robert A. Panariello MS, PT, ATC, CSCS
Professional Physical Therapy
Professional Athletic Performance Center
New York, New York

Overhead weight room exercises such as presses and jerks have gained increasing popularity in recent years. When appropriately prescribed and programed, the performances of these overhead exercises are of great benefit to athletes of various sports of participation. This dialog will provide the reader with some considerations when prescribing overhead weight room exercises.

Why perform overhead weight training exercises?

The daily activities of life as well as the requirements of athletic performance, necessitate the ability to repetitively perform overhead effectively. A painter, an electrician, a construction worker, a basketball, volleyball, tennis, track and field or throwing athlete, are examples of individuals who are required to perform overhead optimally and repeatedly over time.

Overhead Weight Room Exercise Performance

Overhead weight room exercise performance is preferably performed in the standing position. Most athletic endeavors begin and end on two feet. Athletes compete on their feet, and to wind up in a seated position or on one’s back is rarely if ever effective during athletic competition.

There are a variety of exercises available for selection for overhead weight room exercise performance. The various physical qualities trained include strength, power, and elastic abilities. Overhead training in the standing position requires a contribution and coordination of the entire body to produce an optimal exercise performance.  Exercises such as the military press and push press emphasize strength qualities where exercises as push jerks and split jerks include a power/speed component. The eccentric “dip” that occurs during push press and jerk exercises embraces a stretch shortening cycle (SSC) component to the exercise performance as well.

The Plane of the Scapula 

The scapula of the shoulder is not anatomically situated in the coronal (frontal) plane of the body. The concave ventral surface of the scapula lies upon a convex posterior thoracic wall creating a scapula position (angle) anterior to the coronal plane. The plane of the scapula is defined (depending upon the reference) as a shoulder (upper arm) position of approximately 30 to 45 degrees anterior to the coronal plane of the body (Figure 1a).

1

Figure 1a The Scapular Plane of the Shoulder

Figure 1a The Scapular Plane of the Shoulder

Overhead exercises are recommended to be performed in the plane of the scapula as this shoulder position allows for, but is not limited to the following:

  1. The joint surfaces of the shoulder have greater conformity
  2. During arm elevation the inferior capsuloligamentous complex and rotator cuff muscles remain untwisted (rotation is not required)
  3. The supraspinatus and deltoid muscles are optimally aligned for arm elevation
  4. Provides for the greatest scapula upward rotation
  5. Provides for the optimal length-tension of muscle during overhead exercise performance
  6. Most “functional” activities are performed in this plane of motion

The starting overhead exercise position performed in the plane of the scapula is displayed in Figure 1b.

Figure 1b The Scapular Plane Position for Overhead Exercise Performance from the Racked and Unracked Positions

Figure 1b The Scapular Plane Position for Overhead Exercise Performance from the Racked and Unracked Positions

Scapulohumeral Rhythm of the Shoulder

During active arm elevation there is a distinct relationship between the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joints of the shoulder. This relationship or “scapulohumeral rhythm” is also described as a ratio of corresponding motion between these two joints. As the athlete lifts weight overhead the humerous elevates and rotates as the scapula elevates, rotates, tilts, and protracts. The complexity of all coordinated shoulder girdle movement is beyond the scope of this discussion, therefore the elevation of the arm will be described as follows. The initial 30 degrees of unweighted arm elevation is described as the “setting phase”. As arm elevation continues from 30 to 90 degrees, a 2:1 ratio of humeral elevation to scapula rotation occurs and concludes with a 1:1 ratio from 90 to 180 degrees of overhead motion. The total 180 degrees of arm elevation is a result of 120 degrees of humeral elevation and 60 degrees of scapula rotation.

It should be noted that during dynamic arm (humeral) elevation the scapulohumeral rhythm alters, especially when lifting heavy loads. The scapulohumeral rhythm now changes from a 2:1 ratio to approximately a 4.5:1 ratio. This alteration in rhythm is reasonable as the scapula is the platform of stability for efficient humeral mobility and lifting heavier loads will require a more stable platform.

Overhead Shoulder Range of Motion

Overhead exercise performance also requires the athlete to conclude in a properly extended arm position. This position places both arms extended straight and in line with each ear. The athlete must possess the soft tissue and joint mobility necessary to assume this concluding overhead arm position. When lifting weights overhead the barbell will travel through an arc of motion and should conclude in this fully extended arm position (Figures 2a and 2b).

Figures 2a and 2b. The Barbell Path and Arm Position during Overhead Exercise Performance

Figures 2a and 2b. The Barbell Path and Arm Position during Overhead Exercise Performance

If an athlete lacks the soft tissue and joint mobility to assume this overhead arm position, they likely will conclude with an extended arm position anterior to the midline of the body. This anterior arm position places increased and unnecessary stress to the shoulder complex, enhancing the risk of shoulder pathology, especially when exercising with heavy weight intensities.

The Utilization of a Bench during Overhead Exercise Performance

It has been mentioned that a stable scapula is important for the most favorable overhead exercise performance. The stability of one joint(s) is necessary for the effective mobility of the associated joint(s). However, a stable joint is not “cemented” in position so to speak. Although the associated motion between the scapula and humerous adjusts when lifting a heavy load overhead, the stable scapula must also be somewhat mobile as well.

There are many sources that acknowledge how compressive forces will enhance joint stability. This is one concept for the favorable use of closed kinetic chain exercise performance. The question remains is it ever possible to have too much joint stability, thus limiting the necessary joint movement that occurs during overhead exercise performance. When performing overhead pressing from a seated position, often times a bench with a backing will be utilized to assist to stabilize the torso during exercise performance. If the bench backing results in increased compressive forces to the scapula via a “pinning” of the scapula between the thorax and system of weight (barbell weight intensity + body weight) upon the bench backing (Figure 3), will the scapula have additional limitations in motion for effective overhead exercise performance? In other words will the scapulohumeral rhythm ratios be further compromised? This is a concern that we have during overhead exercise performance, and is another reason why our athlete’s perform overhead exercises in the standing position. If there were ever circumstances to perform these exercises seated, we would avoid utilizing a bench with a backing.

Figure 3. The Seated Overhead Press with a Bench Backing

Figure 3. The Seated Overhead Press with a Bench Backing

The Behind the Neck Press

There are also occasions when coaches and athletes will inquire about the behind the neck press exercise. We are not advocates of the behind the neck press in our training facility with one exception. The behind the neck press exercise performance is initiated with the barbell positioned behind the neck and resting upon the posterior/superior aspect of the shoulders. When gripping the barbell in this position the scapula are required to retract as the humerous is now abducted to approximately 90 degrees in the coronal plane of the body and externally rotated (Figure 4).

Figure 4. The Behind the Neck Press Exercise

Figure 4. The Behind the Neck Press Exercise

The behind the neck press shoulder exercise performance position:

  1.  Disregards the advantages of the overhead exercise performed in the plane of the scapula.
  2. This 90 degree abducted shoulder position with the addition of external humeral rotation places a greater amount of stress to the anterior joint capsule and soft tissue structures of the shoulder.
  3. The retracted scapula are now poorly positioned for ideal scapulohumeral rhythm during overhead exercise performance
  4. The overhead exercise performance does not occur at an optimal muscle length-tension relationship.

The exception for the utilization of behind the neck type exercises occurs when working with athletes who compete in Olympic Style Weightlifting. These athletes often assume a barbell position above and posterior to their head during the performance of the snatch exercise. To improve their snatch weightlifting performance, exercises such as behind the neck type presses and jerks, snatch balance, etc. are included in the program design. Behind the neck type exercises are both specific and necessary for Olympic Weightlifting success.

Will the Athlete become Injured when Lifting Weights Overhead?

I am often asked “Will an athlete injure their shoulder with overhead lifting” from the coaches and athletes with whom we work. This is especially true of athletes whom are throwers i.e. pitchers. When asked where they acquired this information their response is usually “That’s the word on the street” or “I read it on the internet”. Let’s discuss this “on the street topic”.

Acromial Morphology

We’ve all heard and/or read that overhead lifting will result in some type of rotator cuff pathology or trauma due to the “dreaded” type III acromion, but I have never been witness to any scientific evidence substantiating this definitely will occur. According to Dr. Louis Bigliani’s acromion classification, a type I acromion is flat, a type II is curved, and a type III is hooked (Figure 5). In a study reviewing 394 cadaveric scapula’s the relative percentage of acromial types I, II, and III were 22%, 68.5%, and 8.6% respectively. There were a greater percentage of type III acromions in men (10.2%) vs. women (6.9%). Acromial morphology was symmetric in 71% pairs of acromions and asymmetric in 29% of the pairs.

Type III acromion’s fall in the minority of the population and although a type III acromion concern may be valid at times, it is usually overstated, especially in the presence of a strong rotator cuff muscle group which will sufficiently stabilize the head of the humerous in the center of the glenoid during overhead exercise performance.

Figure 5. Acromial Morphology

Figure 5. Acromial Morphology

EMG Studies for Overhead Exercise Performance

EMG studies have demonstrated that exercises such as the military press have a significant contribution by the rotator cuff muscle group, especially the supraspinatus muscle, as well as the deltoids and scapula musculature. With such high EMG activity demonstrated by the supraspinatus during overhead exercise performance, wouldn’t it make sense to utilize exercises that enhance the strength of this muscle, as the supraspinatus is the most frequently affected with regard to rotator cuff type pathology when compared to the other rotator cuff muscles of the shoulder.

Are we to be led to believe that Overhead Shoulder Training injuries are Seasonal?

At many high schools and colleges the football quarterback is also a starting pitcher on the baseball team during the spring season. During the spring and summer football off-season training, many programs require quarterbacks to perform the overhead lifts. However, it appears to be “taboo” for these same athletes to perform these same overhead exercises at the time they trade in their football helmet for a baseball cap when participating in a baseball off-season training program. Off-season training programs assist not only to prepare the athlete for athletic competition, but to also prepare the shoulder of the throwing athlete whether they are a quarterback or a pitcher. If quarterbacks are permitted to lift weights overhead and pitchers are not, we are to assume that shoulder injuries will occur during off-season overhead weight room training based on the time of year that they train? Should the athlete be he permitted to train overhead during the spring and summer months but not during the fall or winter off-seasons? At our Athletic Performance Training Center we train a number of professional baseball players each off-season, including baseball players with $100+ Million dollar contracts, and they ALL lift weights overhead without complaint or incidence of injury.

Certainly not every exercise may be appropriate for each individual (hence the reason for the athlete to be evaluated), but isn’t the selection of the specific exercises to be performed by the athlete as well as the training program design the responsibility of the Strength and Conditioning (S&C) Coach?

In my experiences of rehabilitating the throwing athlete or any shoulder athlete, unless a direct trauma is involved it is usually excessive exercise or throwing volume that usually leads to shoulder pathology. Excessive exercise volume will result in muscle fatigue and the inability of the rotator cuff to resist the superiorly (upward) directed vector forces of the deltoid, as well as a repositioning of the scapula upon the thorax. Therefore, not only will excessive fatigue negatively affect exercise performance technique, but with the onset of fatigue the head of the humerous has been shown to migrate superiorly from its position at the center of the glenoid as the scapula will also protract and both anteriorly tilt and internally rotate. This combination of events results in a decreased subacromial space with a consequential increased risk of potential rotator cuff injury. So in most instances where the overhead exercise is blamed for a shoulder injury, one may ask is it the specific overhead exercise or the poor programing that results in excessive shoulder fatigue that is the real culprit for overhead exercise performance injury.

What about the bench press exercise?

A coach or an athlete may become apprehensive when prescribed an overhead exercise, but why does the bench press exercise get a free pass? I personally am not anti-bench press as our athletes do perform this exercise, but not in high volume. In a review of the literature one will find no incidence, ZERO, of anyone tearing their pectorals muscle(s) while performing overhead pressing type exercises, while there certainly are a significant number of studies documenting pectoral tears that have occurred while bench pressing. We treat a number of athletes each year in our physical therapy clinics who tear their pec(s) while bench pressing.

There is also a shoulder condition called “Distal Clavicular Osteolysis” or “Weightlifter’s Shoulder” that may occur with excessive bench pressing. This condition is an overuse (poor programing) phenomenon that causes tiny fractures along the distal end of the clavicle in conjunction with a breakdown and resorption of bone (osteolysis) that occurs at the site of injury. Clearly other shoulder pathologies, including rotator cuff pathology, also occur with bench press exercise performance, and so is there really a justification to have more concern with overhead weight training type exercises?

What about pull-ups?

When speaking to coaches and athletes regarding overhead weight room exercises it appears the main concern is usually due to the potential injury of the rotator cuff via an impingement mechanism as the overhead exercise performance requires the arms to be fully extended overhead. However, like the bench press, there appears to be no concern with the athlete performing pull-up activities. Doesn’t the pull-up exercise also require the arms not only to be fully extended overhead, but the glenohumeral joint is also placed under superiorly directed joint distraction forces.

The point here is that any exercise, if not appropriately selected, applied, and programed may result in a possible shoulder joint pathology. Overhead shoulder exercise appears to be the focus of scrutiny when compared to other exercises that stress the shoulder girdle as well. With proper exercise application and programing is that really a valid concern?

Closing remarks

The S&C coach should perform an appropriate assessment of the athlete prior to the initiation of overhead exercise or any exercise performance. The athlete’s posture, shoulder range of motion, scapulohumeral rhythm, and rotator cuff and scapula muscle strength are a few considerations for this assessment.

The overhead exercise performance should occur in the plane of the scapula and conclude with the arms fully extended directly overhead in line with both ears

Proper program design is essential to avoid excessive muscle fatigue when training over time as weight heavy weight intensity will also have an effect upon scapulohumeral rhythm.

When appropriately prescribed and applied, overhead exercise performance should be no more dangerous that other weight intensity exercises that stress the shoulder.

References

  1. Inman V, Saunder J, Abbot L, Observations on the function of the shoulder joint”, J Bone Joint Surg, 26:1, 1944
  2. Escamilla RF, Yamashiro K, Paulos L, and Andrews JA, “Shoulder Muscle Activity and Function in Common Shoulder Rehabilitation Exercises”, Sports Med Vol 39 (8): 663 – 685, 2009
  3. Getz JD, Recht MP, Piraino DW, Schils JP, Latimer BM, Jellema LM, and Obuchhowski NA, “Acromial morphology: relation to sex, age, symmetry, and subacromial enthesophytes”, Radiology 199 (3) 737 – 742, 1996
  4. McClure PW, Michener LA, Sennett BJ, et al: “Direct 3-dimentional measurement of scapular kinematics during dynamic movements in vivo”, J Shoulder and Elbow Surg, 10:269-277, 2001
  5. McQuade KJ, and Smidt GL, “Dynamic scapulohumeral rhythm: The effects of external resistance during elevation of the arm in the scapular plane”, J Ortho Sports Phys Ther 27: 125 – 133, 1998
  6. Moseley JB, Jobe FW, Pink M, Perry J, and Tibone J, “EMG analysis of the scapular muscles during a shoulder rehabilitation program”, Am J Sport Med Vol 20 (2): 128 – 134, 1992
  7. Panariello RA, “Considerations in Athletic Performance Enhancement Training: Is Using a Bench putting you on the Bench? “ Bret Contreras Website, Oct 2011
  8. She-Kai C, Simonian PT, Wickiewicz TL, Otis JC, and Warren RF, “Radiographic evaluation of glenohumeral kinematics: A muscle fatigue model” J Shoulder and Elbow Surg, Vol 8 (1): 49 – 52, 1999.
  9. Teyhen D, Miller JM, Middag TR, and Kane EJ, “Rotator Cuff Fatigue and Glenohumeral Kinematics in Participants Without Shoulder Dysfunction”, J Ath Train 43 (4) 352 -358, 2008
  10. Townsend H, Jobe FW, Pink M, and Perry J, “Electromyographic analysis of the glenohumeral muscles during a baseball rehabilitation program” Am J Sports Med, Vol 19 (3): 264 – 272, 1991

19 Comments

  • Well worth the read. I’ll be sharing this article with my followers. Thanks Rob and Bret.

  • Tyler Satnick says:

    Honestly that’s an article you should be proud of. Learned something!

  • Sven says:

    Fantastic article. Thank you.

    “If an athlete lacks the soft tissue and joint mobility to assume this overhead arm position, they likely will conclude with an extended arm position anterior to the midline of the body. This anterior arm position places increased and unnecessary stress to the shoulder complex, enhancing the risk of shoulder pathology, especially when exercising with heavy weight intensities.”

    What’s the reason for this, please?

    • Rob Panariello says:

      Sven,

      If the athlete who is attempting to lift overhead is prohibited from concluding the exercise in the proper extended arm overhead position due to a lack of soft tissue or joint mobility the arms will likely assume an extended position anterior to the midline of the body. If you think of the front squat exercise, when the weight is properly racked and held across the shoulders in the proper position, the stress of the loaded barbell is distributed appropriately throughout the body within an optimal base of support. If you flexed your trunk and rounded your shoulders forward while front squatting:

      1. The lifter would have increased soft tissue and joint stress throughout the body as they would be also attempting to prevent the bar from falling forward during exercise performance.
      2. This position would increase joint stresses due to improper exercise technique
      3. There would be increased low back and hip stresses (the fulcrum) as the moment arm of the barbell has increased from the midline position to anterior to this midline position
      4. The lifter would be wasting energy (becoming fatigued) trying to control the barbell while also attempting to execute the front squat exercise.
      5. Muscles would no longer be at an optimal length tension for performance
      6. Performing this “forward” technique heavy weights would place the athlete at higher risk of injury

      With regard to the shoulder, an anterior overhead concluding barbell position factors in all of the above as the moment arm is increased (anterior distance from the barbell to the shoulder) as the barbell is no longer in line with the shoulder. The shoulder is the fulcrum from which movement and additional stress will occur. Another factor one cannot ignore is the coracoacrominal ligament which attaches to the coracoid and acromion forming the coracoacrominal arch. Anterior shoulder stress forces will attempt to translate the head of the humerous in the same direction, add fatigue due to the wasted energy of attempting the control an anterior displaced barbell overhead and you really have a recipe for disaster. The coracoacrominal ligament is an additional anatomical structure, when abutted, to cause soft tissue pathology.

      I hope this helps and thanks for your post.

      Rob

      • Sven says:

        I see, thanks a lot. Whilst I realized that failure to achieve a proper lockout could be indicative of mobility issues, I never realized that it was dangerous (as I thought the last degrees of shoulder flexion were potentially stressful – is that wrong, then?)

  • Mike says:

    Awesome article Robert – you seem to have a knack for taking the complex and making it simple…This gave me a lot of clarity on the subject of overhead work.

    Interesting view on pullups and joint distraction etc being “let off the hook”…It’s funny how strongly the perception of an exercise can mask it’s potential risks.

    Awesome stuff.

    Mike, Australia

  • Dunkman says:

    Outstanding.

  • Frederico estermann says:

    Great article. Would love to see more of them being published here. Cheers

  • Nathan says:

    Great article! Really enjoyed the read and learnt quite a bit too. Thank you.

  • coacherik says:

    I noticed you listed just about every overhead, repetitive movement sport except swimming. Any other thoughts/suggestions/concerns given our sport. Many of my swimmers, myself included, are always concerned about overhead exercises. Especially given our competitive medium and high volume repetition sport.

    • Rob Panariello says:

      Coach Erik,

      In my opinion swimming is a totally different and unique animal. To be clear I am not a swim coach but we do see a fair amount of swimmers for shoulder rehab in our facilities. We also train a couple of swim teams during the off-season as well as in-season. Obviously we don’t personally know each other nor have I seen the training program for your swimmers but the swim coaches that we do communicate with are notorious for having their athletes swim thousands of yards/meters in a single training session day after day. Over time many of these swimmers do get overuse shoulder injuries and wind up either in rehab or in the operating room (I find it interesting as there is a pitch count in baseball to preserve the shoulder but not a “swim count” in swimming). Based on these experiences I am of the opinion that too much work is performed in the pool, but as I stated I am not a swim coach.

      When the athletes are swimming (in-season) I would not perform any overhead work as they are performing overhead work (often excessively) in the pool at practice and during meets. I would keep their body strong with lower extremity, hip, back/scapula and CORE exercises with very low volume work and moderate to high weight intensity. Although it is necessary for the athlete to recover with days of rest, I am a believer that it’s maintaining if not improving (depending upon the sport) strength and power during the season is what keeps the athlete “fresh”. Keeping an athlete “fresh” during the season is not is not a result of just resting and doing nothing.

      In addition, as far as the in-season is concerned, I would also preserve their shoulder flexibility and continue to perform some low volume rotator cuff work to maintain a good gleno-humeral congruency with repetitive overhead stroke performance in the pool. I would not work overhead as I stated previously they work overhead everyday at practice.

      During the off-season we do train some swimmers/swim teams and we work with them as we would any other athlete with overall body exercises, including overhead work, carefully monitoring the overhead volume. If they can’t work their shoulders overhead in the off-season, how do we expect their shoulders to withstand the stress of tens of thousands of overhead swimming yardage once they are back in the pool?

      Just my opinion. Good luck

      Rob Panariello

  • Shane McLean says:

    Rob, really enjoyed the article and the way you backed up everything. Especially the with the behind the neck shoulder press. Liked it a lot. After reading Eric Cressey’s stuff for a while, I would like to be a fly on the wall when you two talk.

  • Rob Panariello says:

    Shane,

    Thank you for the kind words. I do know of Mr. Cressey but unfortunately our paths have yet to cross, maybe one day. Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

    Best,
    Rob

  • Derrick Blanton says:

    Rob, first of all belatedly, this is as thorough and excellent a discussion of overhead training as I have ever read! Outstanding work!

    Secondly, I did have a rather lengthy OHPR technique question that concerns the oft cued advice to “tuck the shoulders” that almost certainly will be answered with, “it depends”, probably on bony anatomy, but I’m very interested in your perspective.

    Let’s assume for the sake of this question, that lifter has full, healthy overhead ROM, and adequate T-spine extension, etc.

    Virtually every technique article or video that I’ve ever read or seen stresses the importance of supinating the shoulders when pressing overhead. This is often described as “screw the shoulders in the socket”, or keep the elbows tucked close to the body, show the armpits, etc.

    Yet as I look at figures 2a and 2b, clearly the elbows start out in front, in the scapular plane, not in the front rack fully tucked position, and end up in line with the spine behind the ears. Since the bar is fixed, and the hands are pronated, isn’t it necessary for the shoulders to unwind internally, i.e. allow the elbows to flare a bit to the outside and thus align the shoulders, elbows, and wrists directly under the bar, (much as we seek to align the hips, knees, ankle, and foot on a squat).

    If the elbows stay tucked tight, then isn’t the force driving the bar backwards as to throw the bar behind you, rather than to send it straight upwards?

    Elbows moving from out in front to directly under the bar seems to me to be effectively an internal rotation of the humerus in the socket in order to better channel force through the bar.

    Here’s a few fairly good representation of this style of OHPR:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8BRaqxAmOM
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwOYmash-xA
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASIC5FyAU0A

    All three lifters are lifting serious load, and as the bar clears the head, they force the head back under the bar, and then immediately flare the elbows wide (IR of the humerus?) to direct force through the bar directly against gravity.

    Certainly, one can try to keep the elbows facing ahead, and the shoulder in hard supination, but then it seems you are basically performing a very heavy triceps extension, with far less deltoid involvement, particularly less lateral delt involvement. So I see the wisdom of keeping a counter external rotational MOMENT to keep the humeral head centered in the socket, but I wonder if the advice to wind up the shoulder into actual external rotation MOVEMENT (taking the elbows with it):

    a.) doesn’t properly stress the deltoid complex in full, and

    b.) simply shifts spiral stress down the chain to the elbows and wrists. We are, after all dealing with a straight bar that must be negotiated here!

    Maybe different styles of pressing are a result of a lifter’s different type of shoulder capsule acromion, etc., and are analogous to the differing hip capsules which require the femur to exit the acetabulum at different angles and rotations, which then must be matched by the knee and foot flare?

    (Another theory is that the flared approach is more shoulder friendly when accompanied with heavy upper trap involvement, which has been discussed extensively before on this blog,_)

    This is quite a long and involved question, and I hope I haven’t tried your patience, Rob. Very, very few folks are willing to discuss stuff like this with any depth. Thank your for your generosity in sharing your expertise, it means a lot. I hope you are well! DB

    • Derrick Blanton says:

      To put it perhaps more simply, as I watch the videos that I linked, all three lifters seem to be rolling their elbows to the outside, and thus their humeri into internal rotation; NOT to the inside into humeral external rotation which is the conventional wisdom, dominant coaching cue offered.

      • Sven says:

        Derrick, it appears your links are missing.

        • Derrick Blanton says:

          Hi Sven! I think when you link videos on the boards, there is a delay for them to post. They are up and working now.

          I know this is a technique point that you and I delved into a couple of years ago on the shoulder packing thread, Sven. Interested in your thoughts, too. This may come down to an individual’s distinct shoulder anatomy, and if so, blanket statements about “do it like this” may not hold up across the board.

          Regardless, these guys clearly have figured out how to OHPR effectively, me thinks!

Leave a Reply

SIGN UP FOR THE FREE NEWSLETTER

and receive my FREE Lower Body Progressions eBook!

You have Successfully Subscribed!